ACTIVIST MEMBERS from all walks of life in
FRANCE, FIJI, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, AUSTRALIA,
CANADA, EIRE, INDIA, GERMANY, SOUTH AFRICA, ULSTER,
JORDAN, PAKISTAN, THE UNITED STATES, AND ENGLAND.
THE CAMPAIGN PHILOSOPHY
is spread worldwide by its members.
Campaign philosophy supported by academics, doctors and judges (U.S. & U.K.). Join in the Campaign by downloading
and distributing the free posters and educational pamphlets. Contact us by e-mail today for your free Membership and
WHY THE LEGAL PROFESSION
CANNOT DEFEND YOU.
Consider some of the following breaches of
common law and Constitution to which modern government resorts, in
order to enforce its money-motivated inequitable statutes:
Today, to ensure the enforcement of whatever
unjust legislation government passes, a government-contrived legal
obligation bans attorneys, solicitors, lawyers and barristers from
presenting evidence which exonerates defendants, if it
"disputes the law." Judges forbid the accused likewise.
In an unforgivable meretricious act of obsequious criminality, for pay, the lawyer adopts the
perjury and subreption* of not presenting evidence which exonerates defendants.
*Definition. subreption: concealment of
evidence; the perjurious procuring of an advantage by concealing the truth.
Over years, literally billions accrue to law firms’
personnel. In order to ply their lucrative trade (one can no longer
dignify this morbid masquerade by calling it a ‘profession’),
nowadays lawyers blithely abdicate responsibility and forsake honesty.
For gain, lawyers perjuriously consent to this odious denial
of the duty to find The Whole Truth.
They compound their malfeasance by also tacitly concealing the Constitutional
Jurors’ Rights and Duty to judge the law and to find the
Verdict according to the Juror’s conscience.
We point out this crime, this disgrace, this contemptible species of
inhumanity. There is no defence to the charge of lawyers acquiescing to the denial of their
duty to find The Whole Truth and their profiting from, and being party to, the abuse and
imprisonment of innumerable masses of innocent citizens. Consider the charges:
Fact 1: "lawyers cannot present defence or evidence which exonerates
defendants if it disputes the legality of the law."
Fact 2: "lawyers must abide by the court’s authority whenever
judges rule out exonerative evidence."
In shameful meek obedience, lawyers do not dispute the
‘law’ even when its enforcement is manifest injustice. Where the law
is unjust and defendants are innocent of any crime (no mens rea),
lawyers nevertheless ‘advise’ people to
plead "guilty" and make plea bargains, rather than their pleading Not Guilty and
electing to go to a Trial by Jury. This comprises one major reason why Trials by Jury
have become so infrequent. It also results in the West’s largest prison population
of all time, consisting principally of harmless citizens innocent of any crime; while the real crimes
go unsolved and largely unchallenged; and the accountable progenitors of crime and their
servitors, the hardened dangerous criminals, go scot free...
See Democracy Defined
Campaign Philosophy Page 2; the section on mens rea, malice aforethought, criminal intent,
"Guilty?" or "Not Guilty?" Wrongful Prosecution; Amnesty & Restitution. See: PROHIBITION:
THE PROGENITOR OF CRIME; Part Six of THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204, which has a Foreword
by an official Adviser to U.S. government and is endorsed by academics,
doctors (of a variety of disciplines) and judges (U.S. & U.K.).
The educated people who comprise the ‘legal profession’
are, by their acquiescence and continued participation in the unlawful,
tyrannical, perverted processes of today, more to blame than
any other group in society for the destruction of the
Constitutional Justice System; and for all the inevitably ensuing
totalitarian injustice that results therefrom: the enactment and
prosecution of ex parte, money-motivated statutes; the abuse of
innocent citizens; wrongful penalisation; and the mass
incarcerations at the highest per capita rate in history.
It is not possible for anyone who is remotely au courant with the
Illegality of the Status Quo, to deem as ‘true’, and as
‘counsel’ the word of these people who collude in and
profit from the widespread enforcement of injustices against innocent citizens.
In myriad cases, defendants would fare better by dismissing their lawyer
and presenting a straightforward courtroom defence and the exonerative evidence for
themselves, which is their right.
If a significant number of defendants were to
take up this option of pleading Not Guilty, electing to go for a Trial by Jury and
presenting their own defence, then the legal profession would either have to put up with
losing the greater proportion of their phenomenally lucrative and easy paydays—or
press hard for restoration of Constitutional Trial by Jury in which
juries judge the law, and defendants and lawyers are obliged, in seeking The Whole Truth,
to present such evidence as reveals an unfounded nature, inequity, venal* motive,
of any modern statutes, and hence the crimes per se of the acts of their
*Definition. venal: corruptly mercenary; (able to be)
bought over; open to bribery.
With defendants presenting defence for themselves, thus withholding from
lawyers a major source of income, the legal professionals would have their prime, perhaps
only, motivating impulse, i.e. money, compelling them to strive—for
once on the side of Truth and Justice—for RESTORATION of
the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System.
In the face of extant modern tyranny, state crime and corruption,
honest members must forthwith free themselves from dependence on income from,
and all association with, the scribes and pharisees of the ‘legal profession’.
The correct course for every man or woman of probity, the only honourable way of proceeding
for members of the profession, is to resist in wrath and indignation, and to refuse to
accept the gains so ill-gotten; and campaign (with us) to right the wrongs.
Insincere, gravely wrong ‘advice’ and mendacity swiftly
become the inscrutable, smooth practised habit of
those who, for money, accept that they cannot tell the truth. Controlled
by courts (judges) under threat of penalty, and as willing, paid participants in this
massive Crime Against Humanity, today’s lawyers cannot give
candid counsel nor veracious defence; let alone be trusted to educate people truthfully about
the principal Safeguard of Democracy: Annulment-by-Jury (or Jury Nullification) in the Trial by Jury.
The lawyer’s is the training which prepares the person for
"the bench"—the judge who takes his pay from the government only
as long as he or she reliably enforces the money-motivated politicians’ inequitable
deceptions dissimulated under the guise of ‘law’.
Today, to ensure the enforcement of the said
inequitable (and therefore illegal) ‘laws’, judges knowingly
exclude exonerative evidence, including expert documentary, legal, academic, scientific,
medical, philosophical, and that which is based on grounds of equity, and tell jurors to
consider only that evidence which he or she (the judge) allows ! (See
THE REPORT, ISBN 9781902848204.)
Thus, today, judges invalidate even their own
pretence that "jurors try matters of fact." By dictating the laws of
evidence, that is, what evidence the jury may and may not hear, and
by ruling how jurors should weigh such evidence as the court chooses
to permit them to hear, judges corruptly arrange and dictate the
conclusion, the Verdict, to which juries must arrive.
This criminal tampering by judges produces
innumerable false guilty ‘verdicts’, penalisation and abuse of
innocent citizens, and millions of man-years’ wrongful
CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL BY JURY IS
(PEACEABLE) RESTRAINT OF
The judges are beholden representatives of governments’—and governments’
beneficiaries’ and partisans’—financial interests. Though citizen-jurors are constitutionally
entitled and morally and legally bound to judge every aspect of the trial of a fellow citizen (the law, facts, evidence and
admissibility of evidence, mens rea, the gravity and nature of the offence, mitigating factors and suitability of
sentence, etc.), governments illegally interfere to seize this power from jurors and misappropriate it to their judges.
The Juror’s Duties are explained on Campaign Philosophy Page One.
Politicians and judges have destroyed Trial by Jury: politicians, because they do not want
citizen-jurors to curtail tyrannical and money-motivated legislation; judges, because these powers aggrandise them
on a permanent basis (jurors serve only momentarily, by comparison); and also because, to remain judges they must
reliably enforce the unjust dictates of politicians on whom they depend for careers and salaries, and to whom they are
subject by impeachment.
The result of this
felony by governments is witnessed in (covertly) venal special interest legislation with
numerous detrimental effects: such as, for example, the monumental engenderment of
criminal acts comprising not less than 75 per cent of all crime in the Western world
(official figures; see THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204); the interminable crescence of
Organised Crime; corruption of officials in positions of trust; a pervading ethos of
brutality which characterises Prohibitionist-led societies; and the haughty indurate attitudes
of police and petty officialdom towards ordinary citizens.
From society’s putrescent ‘top’, the
ophidian politicians’ and judges’ criminal macro-perversion and obstruction of
the course of justice insidiously vitiate, invading and infecting the population,
producing direst results at all levels. Led by the example of these ruthless self-serving
ambitious degenerates, it is small wonder that Western society is visibly degrading,
as seen in the deteriorating standards of behaviour and the latterday acerbic mélange of
the fraught urban social flux.
The power of government consists merely of the physical force
which it brings to its support—of moral force, it has none. Our Western
governments have decomposed into despotisms of the most primitive type. The proof of this
derives from the fact that within the annual avalanche of legislation, there is hardly a single
new law, regulation or amendment to law which would be welcomed by the whole populace
and uniformly enforced by juries.
Bold, upright independent people who can judge the motives and acts of others, are not readily
susceptible to exploitative manipulation by the elected representatives. So, to undermine the people’s morale,
government bestows on the population licence in the place of freedom, knowing that it is easy to achieve control of,
and submission from, people distracted by and preoccupied with their vice and criminality.
State ‘education’ focuses on trivia and careers; rarely, if ever even once during an
incredible ten or eleven years of primary and secondary school classes, on the adult citizen’s most important
secular adult duty, and the People’s most cherished heritage, their principal Constitutional mechanism of Justice
and Liberty for All: the Trial by Jury; its fascinating common "law of the land" origins and history; its definitional
relationship to demokratia, democracy; the working mechanisms by which it achieves its unique rôle, effectiveness;
its true purpose; and its modern indispensability to preservation of the lives, rights, well-being and happiness of all people.
Certainly, there is ignorance and bewilderment in some people. There is
undeniable insouciance, complacency and misanthropy in others; but it is fear
which estranges the rest and petrifies them into inaction. The government-led and engendered
epidemic of chaos and lawlessness throughout Western nations breeds crime, anxiety
and fear in the population. Fearful for themselves, insecure in their own fragile beliefs,
and without alternative leadership or direction, the people cannot bring themselves to face the
certain annihilation which is approaching them, their security and the future of civilisation.
This fear is generated by politicians as a manipulative tool by
which their illegal interventions to our Trial by Jury’s Constitutional guarantee of
justice and democracy go largely unchallenged. The government’s lawlessness,
public insecurity and social disunity create that chaos which forms the familiar backdrop by
which the people are relieved to turn to extreme authoritarian measures and "solutions"
from those who would call themselves ‘politicians’, or better still... leaders.
Control of all governments’ measures (laws) by
the overriding judgements and arbitration of citizen-juries is as much needed today as for
any of the corrupt absolute dictators and monarchs whose inhumanity it was that produced the
People’s response embodied in the very creation and installment of the
Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System.
Amongst those who seek to ‘govern’, the challenges of
domination and ascendancy obsess the psyche and control the behaviour of many
(whether or not they understand themselves). They wish to rule and govern, not to serve and
protect. They make pretence of being ‘decent’ to obtain
votes at the infrequent ballot; but between times are a law unto themselves in dereliction of duties, forsaking
obligations, rejecting healthy virile codes of chivalry and honour, and reneging on their pledges.
Measured by the universally accepted values of equity,
natural law and justice (from which the law of the land common law
derives), these government people’s ulterior agenda reveals them for what
they are: generally and privately unscrupulous, acquisitive of money, fame, power and
material possessions; dishonest and mendacious; disloyal, avaricious, covetous, licentious,
faithless, proud and cruel. This should not come as a surprise though, for
only such people could cause, participate in and tolerate the denial or debasement of
mankind’s model Justice System: Trial by Jury.
In assimilating the above assessment, the reader will notice that
there is nothing to distinguish between these people and the common criminal or gangster;
and yet, these are the individuals who we allow and select to run, or rather run down, our
Western societies. To operate, they simply rely upon a camouflage, a façade of
These ‘politicians’ do not espouse traditional virtues
and values; rather they despise them: faith, hope, charity (love), prudence, honesty, selflessness,
temperance, loyalty, fortitude, justice, liberty, service, and real fairness to one’s fellow
man. Fortunately, the people at large know these virtues, and they have a firm hold on their
minds. Otherwise, there would be nothing left to save of true, compassionate, human civilisation:
that which is host to the natural or universal law’s supreme secular moral values and justice system.
The dismal spectre of totalitarianism that haunts across vast reaches of our planet will find NO home within
the shores of Democracy and wherever Trial by Jury holds sway. Increasingly, individuals from all strata
of society will not succumb to the omnipresent malevolent influence of our banking corporatocracy and their
servitors, our treasonous, decadent politicians, judges and the owned and controlled mass media.
The People would vehemently reject these crooks in government and the
big political parties, if they but knew them for what they are. They would look for and find
the valid alternative. So, while they can, the political gangs subvert the civilised
precepts of salvation (of all mankind) and, in order to strengthen their grip on power,
replace them with pernicious nonsense misnamed ‘political correctness’.
They erode and try to obliterate the wondrous concepts, commandments and
accumulated wisdom of our great cultural heritage. They scoff at and ridicule simple,
traditional proven values for which generations of our finest forebears fought and died, but
won and preserved for us. These abject contemporaries of ours presume to sow the
wind—may they reap the whirlwind...
RESTORATION AND UNIVERSAL
OF COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY
IS THE SOLUTION AND WAY FORWARD
TO A BETTER WORLD FOR ALL.
Today, as a juror, expect the judge to forbid you
from judging on equity, fairness and justice.
Instead, judges instruct jurors to "uphold the law"
regardless; and not to allow conscience, their opinion of the law,
or a defendant’s motives, to affect their decision.
One can speculate WHY judges contravene the
Constitution and civilised Standards and do not inform jurors of their constitutional,
legal and moral obligations: i.e. the Jurors’ Right and Duty to judge the justice of
law enforcement; WHY judges perjuriously misinstruct jurors that they
are ‘not permitted’ to judge the law; and WHY judges
decide what evidence may be heard in court, ruling out evidence which exonerates the
accused, and preventing juries from reviewing all evidence and deciding on its
— disrespect for Citizens’ ability to make fair
— the judge is the willing servant of
antidemocratic oppressive government ?
— unwillingness to part
with his or her power to prejudice the verdict and produce the outcome desired by
the judge himself or by his or her political masters ?
Whatever the judge’s motives, the judge is
wrong not to inform jurors of their Right and Duty
to do justice: e.g. State of Georgia v. Brailsford, a
supreme court forfeiture trial, the facts having been ascertained,
U.S. Chief Justice John Jay instructed jurors that it
remained only for them to judge the law itself,