http://www.democracydefined.org/
The Home Page of The
Democracy Defined Campaign
for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION
of
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.

THE  DEMOCRACY DEFINED INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL
CAMPAIGN.

VERITAS, COGNITIO, IUSTITIA,
LIBERTAS.

Media
and General Enquiries: [email-masked]

Kenn
d’Oudney, Mrs. Joanna d’Oudney & Astra d’Oudney.
CEO/Directors.

(Standard English Spelling)

ACTIVIST
MEMBERS from
all walks of life in
FIJI, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, SCOTLAND, AUSTRALIA,

CANADA, EIRE, INDIA, GERMANY, ULSTER, SOUTH AFRICA,
JORDAN, PAKISTAN,
FRANCE, THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND.

THE CAMPAIGN PHILOSOPHY
is spread worldwide by its
Members.
The
Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics,
attorneys,
doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.)
and judges (U.S. & U.K.).

~

The 30th of July, 2009.
OPEN LETTER
TO:
Sue Maynes and
The writers of Flora Newsletter 5.
Please
forward this to the writers.

Dear Sue,

Please bear in mind that our object in
writing to you is to assist all Australians, including those with land, to
appreciate and come to implement the only effective
(peaceful) method known to mankind of protecting the individual
and his or her personal interests and inherent rights, such as equal
justice, liberty, private ownership of personal goods and property,
privacy and the pursuit of happiness.

FLORA SURRENDERS MORAL AUTHORITY AND
LEGAL SUPREMACY,
THEREBY ABETTING ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNANCE.

The newsletter's writers exhibit a fatal
disregard for (or complete ignorance of) the legal relevance and the
moral dictates of legem terræ common law to
their just cause.

Regarding the Flora Newsletter 5, although you disclaim
authorship, as editor and responsible for its promulgation, your approval
of its contents and approach is implicit. The following comments briefly
explain why the entire Flora approach is not only
self-defeating, but also profoundly incorrect, it being mutely acquiescent
to extremely pernicious, illegitimate aspects of government
maladministration.

WHAT THE SUPREME (SECULAR) LAW
IS.

Be it understood that legem terræ common law comprises the
timeless, supreme secular moral, legal and cultural foundation of all
civilisation, sine qua non. That is to say, the adoption and
implementation of legem terræ Constitutional common law
differentiates civilised society from the barbarity of
despotism.

The Flora newsletter contains no
exposition of legem terræ common law, thereby failing to
express the irrefutable legal arguments and superior moral justification
for the rights of Australian home and land owners, over the illegal
interventions and totalitarian political intentions of statist
politicians.
It is necessary to ensure that you and Flora
writers are aware of the profound differences which exist between
natural law, common law, constitutional law -- and statute law.

Legem terræ common law is comprised of
the universally recognised tenets of justice derived from
natural law and equity, which underpin civilisation. Theists like
to call natural law God's Law.

Legem terræ common
law is based on mankind's natural understanding of the universal
Sense of Fairness (equity) which all sane adults share in common: that
people should "do unto others as you would they do unto you." From early childhood all people, literate or
not, know it when injustices are committed
against them and they know likewise when they commit injustices
to others. (Innocent or accidental acts which cause damage are treated of
by civil law suits and Trial by Jury apportions appropriate compensation.)
However, when the act is premeditated and hence malicious (malice
aforethought; mens rea), common law defines this as
Crime, be it of a lesser or greater degree, and 'Guilt' is definitively
inherent in the act.

The superiority of natural law is witnessed, and confirmed,
by the fact that the written law (statutes) must be interpreted by the
natural. Because natural law and the Sense of Fairness are reliable and
universal, the judiciary is governed by the
rule that, for the interpretation and determining the meaning
of the words comprising a written law, the language of statutes and
constitutions shall be as closely as possible construed consistently with
natural law. Whenever written law (statutes) cannot be construed
consistently with natural law and justice, the written law infracts common
law, rendering the statute abrogate and
illegal.

Legem terræ common
law embodies the universally accepted supreme secular morality which
treats of and attempts to deter Crime, which common law defines as any act
of injustice committed with malice aforethought.

Legem terræ common
law is embodied as the judgements of the people as Jurors in each Trial by
Jury: it contains no statutes of government politicians nor
rulings or 'precedents' of the judiciary.

Trial by Jury is installed within
Constitutions not only to protect the people from common crimes by
ascertaining guilt or innocence of the accused and where necessary
apportioning retribution, but also, of transcendent importance, it is
explicitly and precisely emplaced as a barrier
to protect the vast mass of innocent citizenry from the crimes of
arbitrary government, i.e., unjust laws, tyranny; and from the corruption,
prejudices and incompetence of fallible judges.

THE SAFEGUARD OF RIGHTS, JUSTICE AND
DEMOCRACY.

Viz. all the Western
Constitutions' installed the definitive Trial by Jury in which the Jurors
vet, judge, decide, make and enforce the law.

To protect Australians from injustice:

The Jurors have the duty to annul all acts of
enforcement of arbitrary (tyrannical; illegal) legislation by finding the
Not Guilty Verdict. The ordinary people have the duty and burden of
upholding justice and form the supreme legislature of
government as Jurors who judge all causes and issues,
civil, criminal and fiscal, according to their conscience (i.e., the
sense of fairness and right and wrong), which prevails
over the statutes whenever Jurors deem a statute
incorrect, unjust or contrary to the public interest.

The democratic Principle of our traditional Western
Constitutions' Trial by Jury is that it is the Will of the People
represented by indiscriminately chosen Jurors, not the will of the court
nor the current transient government, that must determine what laws shall
be established, maintained, and how they are enforced. In this way, Trial
by Jury is the common law's Mechanism of Authority by which all the rights
of all the People are protected, and on which all rights
depend. Hence, lawyer Thomas Jefferson's "anchor":

"I consider Trial by Jury
as the only anchor yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held
to the principles of its constitution."
U.S. President Thomas Jefferson; Author of the
Declaration of Independence; co-Founder of the Democratic Party.
See
Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. H.A. Washinton, Lippincotts,
Philadelphia.

By contrast, the statute laws are
imposed -- not by the great mass of the people -- but by
legislatorial majorities following their own interests. According to common, substantive and international laws, most, if
not all of the statutes are illegal.

Proof
of the illegality of most statutes (as if any were needed) is embodied in
the straightforward fact that most (if not all) of the statutes can
only be tyrannically
enforced:

firstly, by denying the Trial by
Jury Justice System in which, to find the verdict, Jurors judge on
the validity, equity (fairness) and justice of the law being
applied;

secondly, by preventing Jurors
from deciding on the admissibility of evidence; of reviewing such evidence
which may reveal that the statutes are inequitable (unfair) and that the
statute works illegally to the bias or advantage of preferred interests
and groups; and

thirdly, by prohibiting
attorneys/ lawyers/ barristers and defendants from "disputing the
validty or legality of the statutes" in the courtroom in front of the
Jury, which would otherwise prove that the enforcement of such statutes
abuses, dispossesses, punishes and incarcerates innocent
citizens; that is, people whose acts are of no malice aforethought;
no mens rea: NOT GUILTY.

QUOTATION from Part Seven of THE REPORT by Kenn d'Oudney, ISBN
9781902848204.

"To a degree achieved by no other system of justice, Common Law
Trial by Jury responds to Mankind's unceasing need: to enforce just laws;
to uphold the innocent; to protect minorities; to nullify arbitrary
government; and to reject injustice."

"The power of government consists
merely of the physical force which it brings to its support—of moral
force, it has none. Western governments have decomposed into despotisms of
the most primitive type. The proof of this derives from the fact that
within the annual avalanche of legislation, there is hardly a single new
law, regulation or amendment to law which would be welcomed by the whole
populace and uniformly enforced by juries. Control of all governments by
the overriding judgements and arbitration of citizen-juries is as much
needed today as for any of the corrupt absolute dictators and monarchs of
history whose inhumanity it was that produced the People's response: the
creation and installment of the Trial by Jury Justice
System."

"Politicians and
judges have destroyed Trial by Jury: politicians, because they do
not want citizen-jurors to curtail their money-motivated legislation;
judges, because these powers aggrandise them on a permanent basis
(jurors serve only momentarily, by comparison); and also because, to
remain judges they must reliably enforce the unjust dictates of
politicians on whom they depend for careers and salaries, and to whom they
are subject by impeachment. The results of this felony by judicable
individuals in government are witnessed in mercenary special interest
legislation with numerous detrimental effects to
citizens."

[QUOTATION
ENDS.]

Following taking the simple
oath to convict the guilty and acquit the innocent, the Jurors'
duties in Trial by Jury are to find the verdict by judging on:

~the justice (or otherwise) of the law, and to annul,
by pronouncing the Not Guilty Verdict, any law or act of enforcement
which is deemed unfair or unjust according to the juror's conscience
(sense of right and wrong);

~in addition to the facts, and
~on the
admissibility of evidence (evidence not being pre-selected or screened-out
by government or judge and/or prosecutor).

The Jurors must judge:

~that the accused acted with malice aforethought,
i.e., mens rea, a premeditated malicious motive to find guilt
('guilt' cannot be ascribed by legislation*);
~on the nature and
gravity of the alleged offence; and where guilt is unanimously
found,
~on mitigating circumstances if any (provocation; temptation;
incitation); and
~set the sentence (with regard to its being fit and
just).

* There is no moral justice nor political necessity
(i.e., deterrent value) for punishing where there was no mens rea.
(In the case of one person injuring another innocently or accidentally,
the civil law suit and the Trial by Jury award appropriate compensation
for damages.)

For jurors not to do the above, or for someone other
than the jurors to make any such decisions, is another process: call it
'trial-by-someone-else' if you will, or 'trial-by-judge' ― but this
travesty cannot be defined as Trial BY
JURY.

The rule of law rôle of convenors of courts
('judges') is as a convenor, and for arranging
security; advisory, inasmuch as this may be requested by the jury, of
which advice jurors may take only what is by them adjudged appropriate;
and for the arranging of re-trials and appeals if necessitated by
circumstances (see Gilbert's History of the Common Pleas, pp. 57
& 70; and Vol. 1 of Palgrave's Rise and Progress of the English
Commonwealth, p. 277; etc. The convenor (judge) has
no judicial authority.

According to common law and for good reasons too
innumerable to delineate here (see the Campaign Philosophy webpage for
details), judges must be locally elected, not appointed by government;
they are answerable, not to impeachment by the legislature, but
instead to the People's common law courts of Trial by Jury.

Consider Moylan v United States, a 'landmark' court
ruling on Trial by Jury which recognises the duty
incumbent upon all citizens to resist insofar as is possible and
prevent the Crime of Tyranny; the arbitrary, corrupt, illegal use of power
by the government (cf. Crime against Humanity).

"If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognise the
undisputed power of the jury to acquit even if its verdict is contrary to
the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence."

"If the jury feels that the law under which the
defendant is accused is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified
the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic
or passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by
that decision."
United States v. Moylan;
U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, 1969, 417 F. 2d
1002.

The supreme common law
prescribes that for any charge or offence, however serious or trivial, no
person shall be dispossessed, punished or in any way disadvantaged, except
according to the lawful judgement or sentence of a unanimous jury of
jurors randomly chosen according to common law principles, of his or her
social-equals in the Trial by Jury. Viz. Magna Carta, The Great Charter
Constitution; Article 39.

Neither in the United States, Britain,
Eire, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, nor in all of Europe and elsewhere,
have legislatures ever been invested by the People with authority to
impair the powers, to change the oaths, or abridge the jurisdiction of
jurors to govern government; nor to remove the universal Right of the
accused to the Trial by Jury of peers for any charge or offence whatever,
however serious or trivial.

Today, U.S. v Moylan is not exemplified by the
modus operandi of courts. Democracy has been overturned by politicians and
judiciary.

Sue,
Until the writers of the
newsletter themselves know, understand and submit to the moral
authority and legal supremacy of the people's legem terræ common law over
legislatorial majorities' self-interested, apocryphal, illegal statute
laws, then the writers of the journal will continue to flounder and
eventually drown in a litigative quagmire.

By failing to base their case on the
Constitutional common law, Flora's writers do not represent the interests
of the Australian citizens in general, and property-owners in particular.
Instead, without realising that they have surrendered the moral high
ground and lost the legal argument, Flora's writers submit to the unlawful
Power Absolute of politicians and their beholden appointed servitors, the
judges.

Flora writers genuflect before lawlessness and supplicate
to the caprice of de facto criminal politicians and their judges,
whereas the only correct way known to the law of approaching
those who breach the rights, infract legem terræ common
law, and usurp the Constitution of the People, is that of uncompromisingly
alerting and educating the population as to the dangerous criminality of
their government (i.e., executive, legislature and judiciary), and
campaign ceaselessly for the restoration of the sole peaceful
antidote to tyranny: the Trial by Jury. There is no better secular
purpose to which the written word and Flora journal could be put.

Flora's present
approach keeps Australians in ignorance of
their protective legem terræ law --
most amongst the legal profession lack the information too. The Democracy
Defined Members who are members of the legal profession have learnt from
this educational campaign, and point out that the universally applicable
legem terræ common law and the proper workings of its Trial by Jury
Justice System have not been taught at law schools for a generation or
more. The situation in regard to Equal Justice is still more degenerate in
France, Germany and Continental Europe.

The genuine Trial by Jury prescribed and defined by
common law enables all sane adults to judge authoritatively what their
laws and liberties are (by the straightforward means explained above), so
that the people retain all the liberties which they wish to enjoy.
For these paramount reasons, it is essential for Flora to know and
pass on to fellow citizens the understanding of how common law provides
mankind’s model justice system by which equal justice before the law is
provided to all. The Trial by Jury safeguards and defines democracy by
which the people control government (rather than the other way
around).

CONSTITUTIONAL DESPOTISM: TRIAL-BY-JUDGE.

Current affairs and history relate a chilling litany of
the judiciary's desertion of the principles of equity and justice in
complacent careers of depraved cruel enforcement of grotesque injustices
on citizens innocent of any crime (no mens rea). Apparently
'cultured', judges past and present nevertheless 'justify' and enforce the
most abject of legislation, e.g. Nürnberg Race Laws; statist
'constitutions'; complicity in the establishing of an agenda biased in
favour of particular individuals against the legitimate interests of
others; primitive 'religious' oppressions; massively
crime-generating inherently illegal commodity 'prohibitions';
etc. This is the barbarous calamity of governments' trial-by-judge.

Without Trial by Jury — no matter how many new
'Bills of Rights', 'European Conventions on Human Rights' or fabricated
'new constitutions' — when it comes to true justice, these
legislative contrivances are figments: worthless, shaming pieces of
paper — fine-worded fatal "Munich guarantees." This is so because judges
are governments' paid and bound obligants, who continuously,
unconscionably, and judicably enforce injustices and infract the laws and
tenets which normal human decency, and legem terræ common
law democratic constitutions emplace.

Sue,
Flora newsletter 5 miseducates Australians,
keeping them thoroughly in the dark about their very real power and
constitutional just authority installed by their wise forefathers to
overrule illegitimate governments' tyrannical acts of enforced
legislation. You and the (shamefully anonymous ? no e-mail contact ?)
writers of the Flora newsletter fail to uphold the primacy of legem
terræ common law which has been lawlessly usurped by
modern politicians and judges. So, despite your technical 'disputation' of
legislation which usurps people's rights, you submit to, and hence abet,
statutory tyranny, trial-by-judge and constitutional
despotism.

Any persons understanding the sublime purpose of Trial by
Jury and forsaking campaigning for its Restoration as the
principal secular socio-political objective above all others, earns and
deserves the injustices which may come to be inflicted on them by the
tyranny which is being brought into existence by their desertion of our
cherished civilised heritage which uniquely derives from and depends upon
the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury Justice
System.

Yours
sincerely,

Kenn d'Oudney.

www.democracydefined.org

"Better never to vote at all than vote for a person who does
not make EQUAL JUSTICE the prime aim of government by
RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of Constitutional
Legem Terræ Common Law Trial by Jury."

Click to read about the authentic
Constitutional Trial by
Jury Justice System.

Kenn d'Oudney is the author of books and
essays including the following:

Kenn d'Oudney est auteur de livres et essais
y compris les suivants:
Kenn d'Oudney ist Autor von Büchern
und Essays einschließlich
der folgenden:

MYTHS
DISPELLED: AN OPEN LETTER TO JAMES MADISON (descendant).

Essay: read it and see for yourself how the Constitution's
Justice System is supposed to work to protect rights, liberty,
property ownership and use, and achieve equal justice for all... and
discover... THE ILLEGALITY OF THE STATUS QUO.

"Hi Kenn:

What a magnificent article! I intend to incorporate parts of it into
my speeches and writings.
Yours in freedom and
justice"
Professor Julian
Heicklen,
Jury
Rights’ Activist;
Coordinator, Tyranny Fighters;
U.S.

"Kenn d'Oudney is a brilliant writer and researcher
when it comes to Democracy and Trial by Jury. The best source of common
law is Kenn d'Oudney."

Dr. John
Wilson,

Jury
Rights’ Activist;
co-Founder & Chairman, Australian Common Law
Party.

"Superb. Should be read in every law
school."
John
Walsh, Barrister-at-Law,
Author;
Constitutional lawyer (U.S. & Australia).

MAGNA CARTA, THE GREAT CHARTER
CONSTITUTION;

freely downloadable
information about pan-European legem terræ common
law, the Law of the Land, whose central tenet and sole justice
system is the all-powerful People's Trial by Jury Courts, defining the
true European and pan-Occidental
Constitution.
http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

"Thank you for
your excellent work on Magna Carta. What a masterly
exposition."
JOHN GOURIET, Chairman, Defenders
of the Realm; Battle for Britain
Campaign supported by The Duke of Wellington; Edward Fox, OBE,
and Frederick Forsyth,
CBE.

"Kenn,
Your
rebuttal is masterly. Your essay is a very good
read."
ROBIN TILBROOK, Chairman
& Party Leader; English Democrat
Party.

"Thank you so much
for this contribution. It is very much appreciated."
ASHLEY
MOTE, MEP (Member of the European Parliament); Vice-President, Alliance of
Independent Democrats in
Europe.

"Thanks, Kenn. I've circulated
this."

SIMON RICHARDS, Campaign
Director; The Freedom Association; Founded by John Gouriet; the Viscount de L’Isle, VC,
KG, PC; Ross McWhirter and Norris McWhirter,
CBE.

TRIAL BY
JURY: ITS HISTORY, TRUE PURPOSE AND MODERN RELEVANCE ISBN
9781902848723, with endorsements and edited section
authored by U.S. lawyer Lysander Spooner;
http://www.democracydefined.org/2trialbyjury.htm

SRC
Publishing Ltd., London, world distribution by LULU of North Carolina.

THE REPORT, CANNABIS: THE FACTS, HUMAN RIGHTS AND
THE LAW ISBN 9781902848204,
co-authored by Joanna d'Oudney; Foreword by a Nobel laureate former
Official Adviser to the U.S. government; endorsed by a Professor of
Physiology Fellow of the Royal Society, academics, doctors (of a variety
of disciplines) and judges (U.S. & U.K.); 260 large-size
pages;
http://www.democracydefined.org/1report.htm

“You have done a splendid job of producing a comprehensive
summary of the evidence documenting that the prohibition of the
production, sale and use of cannabis is utterly unjustified and produces
many harmful effects. Any impartial person reading your REPORT will almost
certainly end up favouring the re-legalisation of
cannabis.”
NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR MILTON FRIEDMAN, former
Economics’ Adviser to U.S. government; Author, video and TV series writer
and presenter; Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution on War,
Revolution and Peace; Professor Emeritus, University of Chicago.

“You represent a worthy part of the fight in many countries for
the logical and beneficial use of cannabis. I thank you for
that.”
PROFESSOR PATRICK D. WALL, M.D., Author; Professor
of Physiology, UMDS St. Thomas's (Teaching) Hospital, London; Fellow of
the Royal Society; DM, FRCP.

“I did enjoy
reading it. THE REPORT should contribute much.”
THE HON.
JONATHON PORRITT, Bt., former Adviser to U.K. government on Environment;
Author; Founder, Friends of the Earth; TV series writer and
presenter.

SRC Publishing Ltd., London,
world distribution by LULU of
North Carolina.

SO YOU THOUGHT CANNABIS
PROHIBITION HAS NO EFFECT UPON YOU ?

THE REPORT ISBN
9781902848204: Part (chapter) Two  contains the unprecedented
(new) Cannabis Biomass Energy Equation
(CBEE; Modern Uses) which proves the clean-combusting
production-cost-free, i.e., FREE, cannabis
by-product pyrolytic CH3OH is the
immediate non-polluting, renewable, total world replacement
for fossils and uranium, whilst simultaneously significantly
increasing world production of staple seed food (protein-rich; no
relaxant in seed). The CBEE exposes the
bankowner-corporate-government monumental ulterior
motive behind fraudulent prohibition. 'Prohibition' is a venal,
cartel-fabricated subterfuge; a false fuel-energy MONOPOLY.

The CBEE Formulation proffers CH3OH oil-gasoline-type fuel combustion for all power-station,
industrial, land, sea and air transportation and domestic energy supply,
with ZERO net atmospheric increase of CO2; viz. the CBEE thereby simultaneously demonstrates
governments’ mendacity in their claims to wish to reduce carbon
emissions, and proves the “eco” and “carbon taxes” to be
fraudulent: a criminal government imposture completely without
foundation. The misuse of exorbitant, world-economy-depressing
fossils and uranium as ‘fuel’ is potentially catastrophic, legally
and economically unjustifiable, and requires to be prohibited
forthwith.
See
pyrolysis diagrams, photo, equation, etc.

Part Six of THE REPORT, PROHIBITION: THE
PROGENITOR OF CRIME.
"To
cause crime to occur is to be accountable for the crime, morally
and legally. To consent to any measure is to share responsibility
for its results."
Legalised, cannabis grows anywhere: the
benign herb's foliage and flowers come free or at an
insignificant price, but yielding no revenues to government and no profits
to corporations. However, prohibition creates the Black Market:
the Economic Effects of Prohibition (scarcity + enforcement, etc.) augment
"street" value by 3000% plus, making all Black Market associated crime
inevitable. The political commodities' prohibition, the
War on Drugs, rather that is to say, the politicians who pass and the
judiciaries who maintain the legislation engender (cause) and are
culpable for not less than 75 -
80 percent of all crimes (official statistics) throughout the West.

EXONERATIVE FINDINGS OF FACT; Official Empirical
Research; THE REPORT collates the medico-scientific Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of the government-funded clinical studies conducted by
world-respected research and academic institutions into non-toxic,
non-addictive natural herb cannabis (differentiated from pharmaceutical
laboratory toxic product THC). The investigations' empirical
evidence exonerates cannabis from all allegations of 'harm' and
'impairment' (including tests on simulated driving) exempting cannabis
from all legislative criteria of control ('prohibition'). All
citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for
other Wrongful Penalisation).

MEDICATION: Efficacious in over 100 adverse
medical conditions (viz. Official Pharmacopoeias) including
applications which are life-saving, preserve eyesight,
Curative and/or Preventive, and with potential cheaply to
replace numerous lines of lucrative but ineffective, debilitating,
addictive, toxic pharmaceuticals, rendering massive financial
government-corporate ulterior revenue and profit
motive (trillions) behind apocryphal prohibition by
perjurious derogation. + Medical Case Histories.

Six Parts (chapters)
include expert documentary, legal, academic, scientific, technical,
medical, economic, social, criminological, philosophical evidence,
and that which is based on grounds of equity, vindicating all private
cultivation, trade, possession and use, and which further exposes perjury
and venality behind prohibition 'legislation', all acts of enforcement
constituting crime per se.

Part Seven, RESTORATION: JUSTICE AND THE CONSTITUTION,
exposes corruption, ineptitude and injustice in the justice process;
examines Law: natural law, supreme secular legem terræ Constitutional common law, treaties, statutes; quotes
presidents, judges, lawyers and chief justices.

THE REPORT is
regularly presented pre-trial by defendants to courts (judges) who
routinely forbid all Findings of Fact, evidence and defences which
"dispute the legality of the law" before the jury. The official
and expert evidence in THE REPORT establishes the apocryphal, illegal
nature of the legislation. THE REPORT quotes legal grounds (national and
international) which demonstrate numerous infractions of laws by the
prohibition legislation, and which show all acts of its enforcement to be
crime per se. All citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and
Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation). This textbook
demonstrates in the law: injustice, inequity, invalidity, adverse effects,
venal ulterior motive, perjury, fallacious derogation, and the
inherent illegality of law which creates the Black Market and
engenders all associated crime.

The outcomes
of this procedure of presenting THE REPORT as documentary evidence to the
judge have proved beneficial in the extreme for defendants.

WE THE PEOPLE AND THE MATTER
OF WORDS; freely downloadable,
indispensable information for the creation and sustainment of legitimate
government and society;
http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

THE CONSTITUTION
TREATISE: Why the
d'Estaing ('European') Constitution-Treaty Is the Antithesis of
Democracy ISBN 9781902848747, see website for
endorsements by U.S. & U.K. cognoscenti;
http://www.democracydefined.org/5constitution.htm

"The
d’Oudney analysis is as insightful as it is comprehensive. It will stand
for years to come as the definitive critique of the European Constitution
prepared by Giscard d’Estaing and others. I look forward to sharing the
d’Oudney analysis with my colleagues."
HOWARD PHILLIPS,
Founder, U.S. Constitution Party; three-time presidential nominee;
Chairman, Conservative Caucus.

SRC
Publishing Ltd., London.

THE
PRINCIPAL TENETS OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF DEMOCRACIES,

An
essay by Kenn d’Oudney.

Educational
Information Series EIS#28.

DEMOCRACY DEFINED: ON THE ETYMOLOGY,
HISTORY AND SIGNIFICATION OF THE WORD DEMOCRACY; the Sciences of
Etymology, Semantics, Semasiology, and Philology determine whether your
country is a definitive democracy or your government is a
despotism. Viz. The word ‘democracy’ is widely abused
and ‘defined’ incorrectly: Democracy is a state of society realised
neither by referenda (mass voting for new laws), nor by
suffrage (electoral voting for representatives), nor by
representatives’ majorities’ legislatorial voting. Electoral
voting, majority rule and ‘consensus politics’ neither create nor
define democracy. This essay summarises the unique signification and
inestimable value to the human race of genuine Constitutional Democracy.

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign.htm#democracy

9-11 TRUTH LINKS COMPENDIUM; exposition with select video analysis & lectures; contributions by
professors, architects, scientists, Federal Aviation Authority experts,
former CIA, FBI, military and government officials, firemen, reporters and
other eye-witnesses present; freely download this Compendium
which serves as an introduction to the subject, and as a source of
additional references for those already familiar with the 9/11 Truth
Movement;

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

IN
PROTECTION OF AUSTRALIANS’ RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE RIGHTS OF HOME OWNERS
AND FARMERS IN PARTICULAR.

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

THE VALUE OR OTHERWISE OF LAW
DICTIONARIES; part of
the contents of a forthcoming book to be published by SRC Publishing. It
is nevertheless, for the time being anyway, downloadable for
free;
http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

ON REFERENDA AND MAJORITY
RULE; part of the
contents of a forthcoming book downloadable for free;

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

RADIOACTIVITY FROM CROPS FED
WITH PHOSPHATE ‘FERTILISER’ IS THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF
CANCER; some Findings of Fact downloadable for
free, extracted from THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204 (referred to above);

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

CHIEF JUSTICE VAUGHAN'S RULING; on perhaps the most famous
trial in history; Juror's Rights and Duty and the Old Bailey Commemorative
Plaque;
http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign2.htm#intervention

WHY THE LEGAL PROFESSION CANNOT DEFEND
YOU; consider some of
the judicable breaches of common law and Constitution to which modern
government resorts in order to enforce its inequitable, illegal,
and money-motivated statutes;

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign4.htm#lawyers

Further reading on the
website:

http://www.democracydefined.org/
The Home Page of The not-for-profit
Educational Campaign for RESTORATION and

UNIVERSAL ADOPTION
of CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.
The Democracy Defined
Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys,

doctors (of
jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges ( U.S .
& U.K.).
Join the Campaign ! Download and distribute free posters
and educational pamphlets.

Membership
gratis.